The Distinction Between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction

Sources on the Distinction Between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction

1. John Gibbon (1629–1718) on Death of Christ: Penal Not Pecuniary and Tantundem Not Idem
2. Joseph Bellamy (1719–1790) on the Antinomian Assumptions of God as Creditor and Sin as Debt
3. Andrew Fuller (1754–1815) on Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction and the Role of Metaphor
4. John Smalley (1734–1820) Eternal Salvation on No Account a Matter of Just Debt
5. Edward D. Griffin (1770–1837) on the Danger of Conflating Pecuniary and Penal Categories
6. Caleb Burge (1782–1838) on the Distinction between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction
7. Andrew Robertson on the Distinction between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction: In Relation to the Sufficiency of the Atonement
8. George Payne (1781–1848) on the Distinction Between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction
9. Leonard Woods (1774–1854) on the Distinction between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction
10. Charles Hodge (1797–1878) on Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction and the Role of Metaphor
11. A. A. Hodge (1823–1886) on the Distinction Between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction
12. Robert L. Dabney (1820–1898) on the Distinction between Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction
13. Samuel Spear on Pecuniary and Penal Satisfaction
14. J. I. Packer (1926–2020) on Civic and Penal Debt
15. Herman Ridderbos (1909–2007) on Ransom as Deliverance at Great Cost: Not Payment
16. J. Knox Chamblin (1935–2012) on Ransom as Deliverance: Not Payment
17. Douglas Kennard on the Non-Pecuniary Nature of Petrine Redemption