Qualitative Equivalency Versus Quantitative Equivalency

Qualitative Equivalency Versus Quantitative Equivalency

Some Definitions: Richard Muller on Solutio, Solutio Idem, and Solutio Tantundem

1. Zachary Ursinus (1534–1583) on Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
2. John Ball (1585–1640) on Equivalency Versus Identity in Christ’s Sufferings
3. Abraham Clifford (fl.1642) on on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
4. Patrick Gillespie (1617–1675) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
5. Thomas Manton (1620–1677) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
6. Benjamin Woodbridge (1622–1684) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
7. Richard Baxter (1615–1691) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
8. Thomas Warren (1616–1694) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
9. Petrus van Mastricht (1630–1706) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
10. Joseph Truman (1631–1671) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
11. Herman Witsius (1636–1708) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
12. Matthew Henry (1662–1714) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
13. Daniel Williams (c.1643–1716) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment
14. John Gibbon (1629–1718) on Death of Christ: Penal Not Pecuniary and Tantundem Not Idem
15. William Symington (1795–1862): Christ Did Not Suffer So Much For So Much Sin
16. William Symington (1795–1862): “Exact Equivalency” Voids the Sincere Offer of the Gospel
17. John Dick (1764–1833) on Christ Suffering the Just Equivalent Not the Quantum of the Law’s Punishment
18. Ralph Wardlaw (1779–1853) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
19. Leonard Woods (1774–1854) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
20. William Cunningham (1805–1861) on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, Not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment: With Attention to John Owen
21. William Lindsay Alexander (1808–1884) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ: With Attention to John Owen
22. W. G. T. Shedd (1820–1894) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
23. Robert L. Dabney (1820–1898) on Quantitative Equivalency Versus Qualitative Equivalency in the Death of Christ
24. Robert L. Dabney (1820–1898) on Quantitative Equivalency and the Extent of the Satisfaction, With Replies from A. A. Porter and B. M. Palmer (1818–1902)
25. Alan C. Clifford on Christ Suffering the Tantundem, not the Idem of the Law’s Punishment: Contra John Owen

Mediating

1. Thomas Brooks (1608–1680) on Christ Suffering the Idem and the Tantundem: A Mediating Position
2. Thomas Jacombe (1623–1687) on Christ Suffering the Idem and the Tantundem: A Mediating Position
3. Edward Polhill (1622–1694) on Christ Suffering the Idem and the Tantundem: A Mediating Position
4. Samuel Petto (c.1624–1711) on Christ Suffering the Idem of the Law’s Punishment

Contra

1. John Owen (1616–1683) on Christ Suffering the Idem, Not the Tantundem of the Law’s Punishment
2. George Payne (1781–1848) on John Owen on Christ Suffering the Exact Quantum of Punishment Due to the Elect
3. John L. Dagg (1794–1884) on Christ Suffering So Much for So Much Sin: Speculation Taking Us Down the Wrong Road
4. William J. Styles (1842–1914) on Christ Suffering So Much for So Much Sin